Layout
The best layout our engine found puts 4 with the 1219 mm side along the length and 5 turned with the 1016 mm side along the length. That covers 89.1% of the floor.
The same 9 pallets still fit after leaving 100 mm of length and 50 mm of width free for handling, so this layout has room to spare.
Floor and door
The 20 ft reefer container has 12.5 m² of floor (135 sq ft) inside. In the same box an EPAL 1 takes 10 positions against 9 for the 48 × 40, so the 48 × 40 pallets cover 11.1 m² against 9.6 m² for EPAL 1.
The door opening is 2,290 mm wide, so the 48 × 40, carried narrow side first, clears it by 1,274 mm.
Inputs
| Inside length × width | 5,454 × 2,294 mm |
|---|---|
| Inside height | 2,273 mm |
| Door opening, width × height | 2,290 × 2,221 mm |
| Guideline payload | 27,700 kg |
| 48 × 40 footprint | 1,219 × 1,016 mm |
| Equipment source | SeaCube Containers. lessor payload, approximate |
Height and weight
EPAL does not publish a height or weight for this pallet, so we cannot compute stacks of empties.
If all 9 clearance positions are filled in one layer, the guideline payload allows on average 3,077 kg of goods per pallet.
Other pallets in the same 20' reefer
How this is computed
The engine tries every split of the deck into rows of pallets placed one way and rows placed the other way, along the length and across the width, and keeps the arrangement with the most pallets. It does not overhang, mix in other pallet sizes or allow for bulging goods. The methodology page explains each step, and the load planner runs the same code on your own dimensions.